Feeds:
Posts
Comments

Archive for the ‘Uncategorized’ Category

Best Green Film?

What is the best green film ever made?

Lets set some rules. It has to be about some aspect of helping the world achieve a sustainable future. It has to be a great, feature length, film and it has to be entertaining and able to reach a reasonable proportion of the global audience.

Here are some suggestions.

1 An Inconvenient Truth

2 The Age of Stupid

3 The End of Suburbia

4 The End of the Line

5 Who Killed the Electric Car

6 The Vanishing of the Bees

7 Wall-E

8 Yogi Bear

9 The 11th Hour

10 Food Inc

11 The Yes Men ix the World

12 Crude Impact

13 Into Eternity

14 Escape from Suburbia

15 The Pipe

That will do for now. If the list starts to become controversial we’ll try and turn it into an opinion poll. Hopefully it will also evolve as great new films appear. Come and see some of these at the Festival this weekend and help us decide on the overall festival winner.

Read Full Post »

You can get tickets for the London venue (Shortwave in Bermondsey Square – http://www.shortwavefilms.co.uk/) online at http://oscar01.savoysystems.co.uk/Shortwave.dll/). The Shortwave UKGFF Programme is:

Friday 20th May 2011

3pm The Plan – (http://theplanfilm.com/film.php)

5.30 pm Plastic Planet – Q&A with Emily James (Just Do It director www.just-do-it.org.uk) and Mark Sanders-Barwick (Sea Shepherd UK http://www.seashepherd.org/uk/uk.html) – Is it OK to break the law to save the planet?  (http://www.imdb.com/title/tt1292648/)

8 pm Planeat – Q&A with Christopher Hird, Exec Producer and Kirtana Chandrasekaran  Friends of the Earth (http://planeat.tv/the-film)

10.30 pm Day of the Triffids (1962) - Come early for drinks, Triffid cake, man eating plants and rare book covers from the John Wyndham collection – wear an eco horror costume! (http://www.imdb.com/title/tt0055894/)

Saturday 21st May

11 am Wall- E – Kids Club (http://www.disney.co.uk/wall-e/)

3 pm Vanishing of the Bees – Q&A with Alison Benjamin (A World Without Bees) (http://vanishingbees.co.uk/)

5.30 pm The End of the Line – Q&A with Rupert Murray (Director) and Arthur Potts Dawson (TV Chef). (http://endoftheline.com/)

8 pm The Pipe – Q&A with Richie O’Donnell (Director) (http://www.thepipethefilm.com/main-sect/)

10.30 pm Into Eternity – Intro by Pete Wilkinson (Founder of Friends of the Earth and Greenpeace and nuclear expert) (http://www.intoeternitythemovie.com/)

Sunday 22nd May

3 pm Breaking Away – Supported by Southwark Cyclists (http://groups.yahoo.com/group/southwarkcyclists/message/10251)

5.30 pm Gaslandhttp://www.gaslandthemovie.com/

8 pm Wasteland – Q&A with British Art Icon Andrew Logan (http://andrewlogan.com/) - http://www.wastelandmovie.com/

Thanks to our sponsors – Friends of the Earth, GVA, Michael Gallie & Partners, Deloitte, Igloo Regeneration

And to our supporters – Vast, Anita Morris, Passenger Films, Bermondsey Square, Southwark Cyclists, Film London, The Co-op and all the speakers, film makers and volunteers without whom none of this would have been posible.

Read Full Post »

Steve Rose in the Guardian wrote a nice piece on the Festival today as follows ‘Like horror or science fiction, environmental cinema is now a genre of its own – and one that sometimes overlaps those others – so it’s only fair it should get its own festival. Here are documentaries, guests and discussions to rouse, or terrify, you into action. The makers of foodie doc Planeat are on hand, Harry Shearer Skypes an intro to his New Orleans doc The Big Uneasy, landscape photographer Joe Cornish attends the premiere of a film on his work, and nuclear waste doc Into Eternity is accompanied by Friends of the Earth. Kids films and eco-minded vintage sci-fi show that it’s not all doom and gloom.’ www.ukgreenfilmfestival.org

Read Full Post »

The End of the Line

Changing hearts and minds takes time. Charles Clover’s journey started in 1990 when he first realised the damage that Beam Trawlers do to the sea bed. It took until 2004 for his book, The End of the Line, to be written and published and a further five years until it was made into a powerful and intensely rewarding film by incredibly talented director Rupert Murray.

In 1992 Northern Cod stocks collapsed off Newfoundland resulting in a fishing ban and a devastating loss of livelihoods. Today Northern Cod has endangered species status.

This story is being repeated across the world in ocean after ocean, sea after sea.

And yet in most of the world we seem unable to respond to this human diet and biodiversity disaster.

In Europe, for some species, we manage to catch double the legal limit set by politicians and four times the level scientists say will allow fish stocks to recover. And the mad rules result in fisherman discarding almost as much as they catch.

It took scientists until 2002 to realise that fish catches globally had been declining since about 1988. It now appears that large fish stocks have collapsed by around 90% since the 1950s.

In the EU, Fisheries Commissioner after Fisheries Commissioner announces reviews of the policing of fishing and each time they fail to combat the market forces and vested interests.

It feels like the European political system is almost designed to fail. For six years the EU Fisheries Commissioner was Maltese and appeared to be actively protecting the interests of the Maltese fishing industry. The pressure on national governments came mainly from fishermen and the related industry with underlying support from consumers interested in cheap food. They all wanted fishing to continue in the short term as much as they could.

The Green lobby appeared almost powerless.

But over time these pressures appear to be changing. General environmental awareness amongst voters increases gradually thanks to books, films and television programmes and the wider media. When The End of the Line was released celebrities were writing letters to their favourite restaurants to ask for endangered fish species to be taken off the menu.

Two years later Hugh Fearnley Whittingstall’s Big Fish Fight and TV series achieved a petition with 650,000 signatures.

This is a level of popular awareness that impacts politicians and retailers. And it feels like a pretty straight path from Charles Clover’s book via Rupert’s film to Hugh’s telly series. A step by step building of awareness and anger.

Recent research by Channel 4 Britdoc Foundation has shown that while the cinema audience for the film has been less than 10,000, its TV audience has been a million and nearly five million people are aware of the film which has amassed press and media coverage worth over £5million and critically was the inspiration for Hugh’s campaign as well as influencing businesses and politicians.

But incredibly in 2011 Nobu is still selling Bluefin Tuna (endangered since 1996).

So we clearly need to go further and the levels of anger and awareness need to be increased and repeated in countries across the world to motivate politicians to act effectively before the market failure that is over fishing becomes irreversible and whole marine eco-systems collapse.

The End of the Line calls for the designation and policing of Marine Reserves, consumers to ask about where the fish comes from and not eat unsustainable fish or at restaurants that can’t prove they serve fish from sustainable sources and for politicians to respect the science and cut over fishing.

These are three simple tasks and we can start by going here http://endoftheline.com/.

And because we forget we can keep showing and watching the film and revisiting the website and telling our friends.

This is a winnable battle, the problem is political will, and we are that will.

This is a must see film for everyone in the world.

Read Full Post »

A Crude Awakening

Made a couple of years after The End of Suburbia this film also deals with Peak Oil and has the benefit of a reasonably strong portrayal of the evidence on which this is based although the metaphoric image of a rocky mountain top is misleading in the extreme.

Like End of Suburbia it is also an alarmist film but one that goes further to create a shock effect. Interviews with the directors suggest that this is deliberate but it is a high risk tactic. Psychologists have a considerable amount of evidence that many people will take these warnings with a ‘I can’t do anything about it so I might as well enjoy it while I can’ attitude.

Cars, planes, suburbs and tower blocks are all shown as examples of things that depend on cheap oil with the images of a Hummer showroom, the vehicle proudly described by the salesman as doing 10 miles to the gallon, looking particularly anachronistic to a European audience.

The film has a tendency to mix its messages portraying oil as the world’s most valuable resource, highlighting the environmental degradation left after its exploitation and of course the warnings around peak oil. It suggests the need to rebuild US cities from scratch and quickly but fails to explore what a viable alternative might be if that objective proves undeliverable.

The use of very old archive footage gives an air of unreality to the proposition that we are facing a 1973 or Great Depression style dislocation that will inevitably lead US society back to a rural lifestyle.

Overall the audience reaction seemed flat and depressed rather than galvanised into action and the director’s objective to shock didn’t seem to be achieved. We were left with the impression of an Irish and a Swiss director shouting an American audience. Given the chauvinism of many of those audiences this may not be the most productive narrative approach.

This goes to the heart of Green Film making. In most English speaking countries we have got to the point where there is widespread awareness of the issue, helped no doubt partly by films such as these despite their generally relatively small audiences. We need to keep educating particularly the younger generation while being wary of encouraging the climate change deniers. But the proportion of the population that is prepared to act to significantly adjust its lifestyle in response is an order of magnitude smaller.

Perhaps film needs to be more focussed on seeking to achieve effective action. Films that succeed in both entertaining large numbers of people and creating a social consensus that creates the space for politicians and businesses to act on their behalf seems to be what is needed this decade.

Read Full Post »

End of Suburbia

Sometimes the older films gain increasing relevance as time passes. I last watched End of Suburbia in about 2005 when the combination of archive footage selling suburbia to the new middle classes in the USA with the talking heads of today’s environmental experts gave a powerful message about the market failure that is the US (and many other places around the world) suburb.

Its increasing relevance was brought home to me in a recent rewatch on DVD which coincided with the news that a number of global car companies are thinking of buying local car club company City Car Club. End of Suburbia describes how General Motors, Standard Oil and Firestone Tyres were convicted of conspiring to buy up and close down the light rail companies that had created a series of walkable suburbs around the major US cities. I recall the film Who Killed the Electric Car which told a similar story about the early electric car innovators being bought and closed by the big car companies.

The possibility of assigning evil motives to car companies buying car clubs is easy to see. Buy them up and close them down because this successful example of collaborative consumption is bound to undermine car sales. It wouldn’t be the first time something like this had happened although ironically both previous examples now, in deep retrospect, look like ignorant and evil decisions at best, massive market failure at worst.

End of Suburbia fairly deliberately seeks to shock suburban America out of its unseeing acceleration down the suburban cul de sac. It does a good job of explaining that Peak Oil doesn’t mean running out but does mean higher prices. Where it struggles though is to posit some of the potential innovations (including incremental lifestyle changes, renewable energy and energy efficiency) that might mitigate the shock. Instead it highlights the possibility of continuous war and increasing and deepening recessions.

The message may turn out to be correct but if it isn’t the accusation of crying wolf will inevitably be made and the longer we go without suburban society collapsing the more the naysayers will gloat, particularly as the dates forecast are passed, even if they are ultimately proven wrong.

Our understanding of the issues has progressed since this film was made in 2004 but it still is prescient about issues like the reliance on natural gas in the US (a good introduction to the film Gasland).

One of the keys is the politics of adjustment. The behemoths of the old fossil fuel economy have substantially more political influence (mainly paid for) than the new green tech economy. The film makes this point well including an accusation against Walmart of destroying local supply networks which is topical in the UK as anti Tesco riots occur in Bristol.

How we will judge films like End of Suburbia is kind of the theme of the film Age of Stupid set in the 2050s. It would be nice to think they will turn out to have been way too aggressive in their warnings and that we will innovate our way to a smooth adjustment to the low carbon economy. If that is the case we may never know if their message helped or hindered. If they turn out to be right we will truly be in trouble.

Whatever the result the need for action is clear in this film.

Read Full Post »

I’m never quite sure with Americans.  But when Peter O’Brien, executive director at the DC Environmental Film Festival suggested I might like to visit Washington and check out their festival, I didn’t much mind if he’d really meant it.  Or if he was simply being polite.  I’d booked my flights a few hours later.

Thursday:

Think David Attenborough sort of crossed with an oriental Rolf Harris and, if you’re British, you’ve probably got a reasonable facsimile of David Suzuki in terms of his television career and appearance respectively.  If you’re Canadian, on the other hand, he’s been a household name most of your life and needs no introduction.

And so it was, only 20 minutes after I’d arrived at my hotel, I found myself sitting in the splendour of the Smithsonian Natural History Museum watching ‘Force of Nature: The David Suzuki Movie’.  A thoughtful film built biographically around David’s life, it tells at once a very human tale of personal challenge, vision and drive and yet gently but powerfully interweaves that life story with wider truths around environmental crisis.

For the keen, or for those to whom it wasn’t (according to their body clocks) 3.30 in the morning, there was an opportunity to meet the man himself after the film.  And, of course, buy the book.

For me, bed was irresistible.

Friday:

It’s fair to say Maribel wasn’t quite what I expected.  Having emailed pretty much daily as I scrambled to organise a meaningful trip in the few days I had to do it before my plane left Heathrow, I’d built up a picture in my mind of a well organised, no-nonsense and dare I say slightly portly, late-middle-aged lady – the de facto gatekeeper to Peter the CEO, protecting him and the rest of the festival team from distractions like me.  Well, so much for email.  But I was right about her being well organised.

And as I sat over lunch with both Maribel and Peter in a little French restaurant in the laid back and casually sophisticated Georgetown neighbourhood, I couldn’t help but be impressed at how keen they were to share their experiences and lend a hand to a film festival virgin.  Despite being in the middle of the two weeks of the year that they spend 50 weeks preparing for, they were encouraging, enthusiastic, and wise.  Nineteen years in to the DC festival, they and those before them, had picked a few things up along the way.  And I was there to learn.

Friday night:

Werner Boote’s a funny chap.  A man who loves the smell of plastic.  Who inhales it deep into his lungs as if it were a crisp, fresh Spring morning.  Albeit with a mischievous twinkle in his eye.  Make no mistake, there’s a touch of the Louis Theroux about him.  Take him too lightly and, judging from some of the (in some cases probably personally innocent) characters in the film, and you’re going to find yourself confiding things to him on camera that are likely to be somewhat career limiting.  At best.  (I still wonder, even now, what became of the eager young girl in the Chinese plastic plant…)

This was ‘Plastic Planet’, a film by Werner Boote.  And also my first visit to an international embassy, the Austrian Embassy in this case (which I have to say, on a road lined with embassies representing virtually every country in the world I could think of, this one looked like one of the more open to visitors.)  Anyway, I won’t spoil the film.  It’s quite brilliant, if frightening (you’ll think twice before buying plastic wrapped food again).  And it’s showing at our festival in a few weeks’ time.

Body clock all over the place for a second night in a row, my recollections beyond the screening are not great.  But I can confirm that the Gin Rickey is the official DC tipple.

Saturday:

There’s surely a time coming in the States, if the effort taken to fill a parking meter with quarters is anything to go by, when someone finally invents the whole one dollar coin – I will gladly accept royalties for coining (groan) the idea here first.  But Maribel, armed with more festival bits and bobs than you could shake a stick at, needed to park somewhere.  Somewhere near the Smithsonian National Museum of African Art for the late morning screening of ‘Burning in The Sun’.  For those who think they’ll find films with an environmental bent depressing or preachy, this film is the antidote.  Funny, uplifting and inspiring it tells the story of a young man in Mali who is going to change to world.  One do-it-yourself, recycled solar panel at a time.  One village at a time.  And he will too.

Windfall’ caught me off guard.  Screened at the only actual cinema I visited during my stay (the AFI Silver Theatre in Silver Spring, a few miles out of DC), I’d expected (I think reasonably) to see a film about the planet-changing, grid-decarbonising potential of tall, green, serene wind turbines.  What I got was a film that challenged my views to the core.  Laura Israel, the filmmaker and Lisa Linowes, the executive director (both of whom took questions at the end of the film) have made a film that doesn’t question whether wind might be an appropriate tool in the box to help tackle climate change – but they ask very serious questions about scale, siting, community engagement, and the power of the large corporates (a theme to be found in so many films dealing with climate change) who exert so much control over the lives of ordinary people.  I couldn’t say I enjoyed this film (sadly it seems nothing is immune from the influence of the big corporates).  But I learned a few things.  Firstly, that not everyone who objects to wind turbines can be written off as a NIMBY.  And secondly, that (here as in so many arena in life) the world simply isn’t as neatly black and white as we might find convenient to our own particular ways of thinking.

Jet lag cracked, Saturday night was a late one.

Sunday:

Did you know that two of the most famous landmarks in DC, the White House and the Capitol, were burned down in 1814?  I didn’t either.  But that interesting historical nugget was impressed on me by the tour guide leading an otherwise all American tour party around the various sights of DC on a bright and thankfully fresh Sunday morning – that and the other small point about the destruction being at the hands of the British army.  That untimely revelation, it’s fair to say, was probably the second most embarrassing part of being on the Official DC Segway tour.

Later, safe within the peaceful grandeur of the National Building Museum, I reverted to type, and green architecture.  Here was a short film double bill:  ‘Rick Joy: Interludes’ followed by ‘Kieran Timberlake: Loblolly House’.  Both interesting, but probably something to talk about with fellow property development types than wax about here.

Sunday night:

All I can say about Sunday night, and the inevitable flight home, is that it came too soon.  It had been a whirlwind, but it had been a real treat.  I’d spent three days in a city I came quickly to love, with people who showed me immediate and genuine friendship.

And as for the films?  What films they were.  I’d seen films that made me think; films that made me angry; films that made me cry (quietly and discretely, of course, in a suitably British way); films that made me laugh; films that made me despair; and yet films that, despite everything, made me hopeful.

Now to bring it home and do it here.

John Long, festival director, UK Green Film Festival

Read Full Post »

Waste Land

The cool Mancunian usher at Manchester’s Cornerhouse cinema had watched the first showing of this film as part of their Latin American festival and was still buzzing when I arrived for the second show. ‘It’s really great’ he said. ‘You’ll love it’

It’s probably something they teach at usher university but he was right.

Set in Jardim Gramancho, the world’s largest landfill, in Rio, surrounded by drug ridden favelas and their socially excluded populations, the narrative of this film is of an art project with angst ridden (for the artist) social implications but the narrative cloaks, and entertains, a powerful documentary about landfill, waste, recycling and the dignity of humankind.

It’s is quite possible that the sheer horror of picking through a city’s rubbish cannot be fully communicated on film alone but some of the images and stories are gut wrenching.

And the statistics are extraordinary. 3000 pickers, earning $20 – $25 a day recovering 200 tons a day (equivalent to the waste from a town of 400,000 people) out of 70% of Rio’s waste. This activity has created a sophisticated supply chain based on markets and specialisations adapting the recycling daily to the demand for its output with service industries (hot food) and governance emerging to supply the pickers’ needs.

But the statistic that sticks came from an uneducated picker dying from cancer. ‘When they ask ‘why should I recycle this single can?’ I tell them, 99 is not 100’.

So it’s an environmental film but that isn’t the reason to see it. The real human stories around which the film revolves are powerfully emotional and enhanced by Moby’s entrancing soundtrack.

I cried.

Despite the emotion this film is an uplifting joyful experience not to be missed.

Read Full Post »

iPods and iPads are all the range at the moment so check out these handy eco-friendly and sustainable cork sleeves available at Nigel’s eco store.

Read Full Post »

No Impact Man

I watched this film (http://www.noimpactdoc.com/index_m.php) outdoors on a summer’s evening in Melbourne’s Fed Square amongst a sparse crowd including kaftan wearing, cross legged sitting, baby crawling Australian hippies attending the Sustainable Living Festival. Melbourne is a city of contrasts. In a country already consuming resources at a rate of around 3.8 planets, its urban growth limits are continually extended to achieve cheap homes (with expensive road building, fuel, air conditioning, water and planetary costs) but it nevertheless has made huge liveability strides in its downtown and inner suburbs and has some great academic research strengths in the sustainability field. Despite the evidence climate change seems to have become a political football.

The film seemed to absorb the mainly committed green crowd who found it interesting and instructive to see what most Americans and Australians would regard as an extreme anti consumerist green lifestyle change made by Colin Beavan and his wife and young daughter.

I struggled a bit with its cross between home movie and fly on the wall documentary camera work and scripting and the year long dragging narrative. The film was also laced with the inevitable inconsistencies arising from trying to approach a zero planetary impact while living in an expensive apartment in New Yorks 5th Avenue.

Films like this, and the media exposure the story creates, are something of a double-edged sword. For some they provide examples and awareness of the problems and the potential solutions. For others they cast the environmental movement as dangerous religious fanatics and undermine the credibility of the climate change message and the behavioural changes required.

This battle, between the climate change deniers and sceptics and the environmentalists is being fought out around the world and particularly in the English speaking countries where it is becoming increasingly aggressive. Reducing car domination in cities is one topical battleground. Speakers at Melbourne’s TEDxCarlton (http://tedxcarlton.com/) conference Gil Penalosa and Gilbert Rochecoust had explained the successful transformations they had undertaken respectively in Bogata and Melbourne’s lanes and Gil had also talked about the work to increase cycling being undertaken over the last couple of years by Janette Sadik-Khan the NYC Transportation Commissioner. This is work supported by Colin Beavan in his blog (http://noimpactman.typepad.com/) but there is a feeling that this may be something of a red rag to the motoring lobby bull and therefore potentially counter productive.

It’s always hard to criticise someone who is doing so much more than most to reverse climate change so by all means take your committed and sympathetic green friends to this film but leave the others at home to watch Jeremy Clarkson on Top Gear.

Read Full Post »

Older Posts »

Follow

Get every new post delivered to your Inbox.